Mining for recurrent long-range interactions in RNA structures reveals embedded hierarchies in network families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wealth of the combinatorics of nucleotide base pairs enables RNA molecules to assemble into sophisticated interaction networks, which are used to create complex 3D substructures. These interaction networks are essential to shape the 3D architecture of the molecule, and also to provide the key elements to carry molecular functions such as protein or ligand binding. They are made of organised sets of long-range tertiary interactions which connect distinct secondary structure elements in 3D structures. Here, we present a de novo data-driven approach to extract automatically from large data sets of full RNA 3D structures the recurrent interaction networks (RINs). Our methodology enables us for the first time to detect the interaction networks connecting distinct components of the RNA structure, highlighting their diversity and conservation through non-related functional RNAs. We use a graphical model to perform pairwise comparisons of all RNA structures available and to extract RINs and modules. Our analysis yields a complete catalog of RNA 3D structures available in the Protein Data Bank and reveals the intricate hierarchical organization of the RNA interaction networks and modules. We assembled our results in an online database (http://carnaval.lri.fr) which will be regularly updated. Within the site, a tool allows users with a novel RNA structure to detect automatically whether the novel structure contains previously observed RINs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".