MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795184640 · doi:10.2118/190159-ms

Successful Field Trial of a Novel, Reservoir-Triggered Polymer: Results, Interpretation and Simulation

2018· article· en· W2795184640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheologyPolymerEnhanced oil recoveryReservoir simulationPetroleum engineeringWater injection (oil production)Materials scienceOil fieldViscosityEnvironmental scienceGeologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes the interpretation of a successful inter-well field trial of a novel reservoir-triggered polymer technology, making use of pressure transient analysis and numerical simulation. The polymer has been engineered to improve sweep in oil-bearing formations whilst reducing the impact of two of the key operational and economic challenges facing polymer enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The polymer employs a chemical strategy to render it resistant to shear during injection and in the high flux region at the sand face. In addition, the injection solution has a viscosity similar to that of water until triggered in the reservoir, which sustains injectivity. We demonstrate the use of laboratory kinetics, rheology data, high-resolution surveillance of the injector, and comprehensive analysis of produced fluids to constrain the simulation of the in-situ viscosification of this polymer. Numerical models using commercial and in-house R&D codes were calibrated to tracer effluent data, pressure fall-off tests, and injection pressures, to interpret the size and mobility of the polymer bank and its response to water injection. The field trial has qualified the polymer to be considered for deployment. A comprehensive surveillance programme and downhole sampling was used to successfully demonstrate that the polymer was protected from shear degradation upon injection and propagation, and it viscosified under flow at the designed location in the reservoir. Kinetic and rheology data from laboratory testing, combined with reservoir-scale simulations and field trial surveillance, enabled the reaction and adsorption characteristics of the polymer to be estimated. Simulations of the injection pressure demonstrate that this polymer has significantly better injectivity under matrix conditions than would be obtained with a conventional polymer of an equivalent deep-reservoir viscosity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it