MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795198781 · doi:10.1117/12.2295961

Damage detection with an autonomous UAV using deep learning

2018· article· en· W2795198781 on OpenAlexaff
Young‐Jin Cha

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2018 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaconGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceReal-time computingDroneGPS signalsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningBridge (graph theory)Structural health monitoringArtificial intelligenceVisual inspectionAssisted GPSEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Civil infrastructure is important to ensure the ongoing functionality of human living environments. However, in North America, much of the infrastructure is aging and requires continuous monitoring and maintenance to ensure the safety of people. Traditionally, visual inspection has been carried out to monitor the health of such structures. However, assessments require trained inspectors, and monitoring methods are difficult due to the size and location of the infrastructure. Recently, data acquisition using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with cameras has been growing in popularity, and research has been conducted concerning the use of UAVs for the visual inspection of infrastructure. However, UAV inspection requires skilled pilots and the use of a global positioning system (GPS) for autonomous flight. Unfortunately, for some locations, a GPS signal cannot be reached for autonomous flight of the UAV. For example, the GPS signal on the inside of a building or underneath a bridge deck is unreliable, but these locations also require inspections to ensure structural health. In order to address this issue, autonomous UAV methods using ultrasonic beacons have been proposed. Beacons are able to provide positional data allowing UAVs to perform the autonomous mission. As an example of structural damage, we report the successful detection of concrete cracks using a deep convolutional neural network by processing the video data collected from an autonomous UAV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2018Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207