MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795227882 · doi:10.26522/ti.v7i1.1731

Le graffiti danse comme… / The graffiti dances like…

2018· article· fr· W2795227882 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Exposition De groupe

Bibliographic record

Venueti< · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraffitiArtHumanitiesVisual artsTheme (computing)Art historyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le graffiti danse comme… / The graffiti dances like… (2018)Lithophanies (photographies digitales et impression 3D) sur le thème du mouvement + Ecriture poétique à partir du graffiti de Mat Vizbulis. Les verbes de mouvement entre guillemets dans le texte en français sont empruntés à L’esprit du temps / The Spirit of the Time (2015) de l’artiste/auteur Daniel DugasLithophanies (digital photographs and 3D printing) on the theme of movement + Creative writing based on graffiti artwork by Mat Vizbulis. Verbs of movement placed between brackets in the French text are excerpted from L’esprit du temps / The Spirit of the Time (2015) by artist/author Daniel Dugas

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.368
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.039 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueti<Same topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207