MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795286600 · doi:10.18174/444615

Verification of PUM’s intervention logic: Insights from the PRIME toolbox

2018· report· en· W2795286600 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToolboxPrime (order theory)Computer scienceProgramming languageMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PUM aims to contribute to sustainable economic development by enabling Dutch senior experts to transfer knowledge to small and medium enterprises in developing countries, thereby improving their performance. PUM Netherlands senior experts aim to contribute to sustainable economic development in developing countries by improving the performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). PUM wants to achieve this aim by linking Dutch senior experts to SMEs in developing countries to stimulate knowledge transfer, help SMEs to apply for grants and promote business links with Dutch companies. With increased knowledge levels, new business links and access to grants, SMEs are expected to improve their business practices. That, in turn, should lead to higher turnover and profit, better employment, increased sustainability and more business with Dutch companies. Each of these outcomes is expected to contribute to sustainable and inclusive economic growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it