MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795328000 · doi:10.2118/190255-ms

Coupled Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Using an Equation-of-State Approach

2018· article· en· W2795328000 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Liwei Li, Russell T. Johns

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergi SimulationPennsylvania State University
KeywordsCapillary pressureRelative permeabilityClassification of discontinuitiesImbibitionMechanicsCapillary actionSaturation (graph theory)WettingEquation of statePermeability (electromagnetism)HysteresisMaterials scienceThermodynamicsChemistryMathematicsPorous mediumGeologyPhysicsMathematical analysisGeotechnical engineeringPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate and continuous capillary pressure (Pc) and relative permeability (kr) models are key relations in modeling of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Current commercial reservoir simulators tune empirical models for relative permeabilities and capillary pressures to experimental data based solely on a limited set of data under immiscible conditions. These empirical models attempt to represent very complex compositional processes, even though they are only a function of phase saturation and type. Thus, "fully" compositional models that use these empirical relations are not fully composition and discontinuities in compositions and saturations result. These discontinuities lead to failed simulations, significant inaccuracies and increased computational time. This paper develops a coupled equation-of-state (EoS) kr-Pc model that can reproduce important features of the current empirical models, but also yield physically consistent predictions that cannot generate discontinuities. The model parameters use the same inputs for both relative permeability and capillary pressure and are tuned simultaneously. We focus here on capillary hysteresis and understanding the components of the EoS from measured data using saturation, phase distribution (Euler characteristic or phase contact area), and wettability as inputs. The new EoS Pc model maintains a similar functional form as the common Brooks-Corey correlation, and can predict capillary pressure away from the tuned experimental data. The results using CT scans of imbibition and drainage processes show excellent agreement once contact angle hysteresis is included. A quadratic response surface is used to understand better the functional form of the EoS, i.e. partial derivative expressions. The new coupled kr-Pc approach could improve compositional simulation by making it faster, more robust, and accurate since these key parameters are more continuous and physical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Improved Oil Recovery ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207