MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795328000 · doi:10.2118/190255-ms

Coupled Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Using an Equation-of-State Approach

2018· article· en· W2795328000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergi SimulationPennsylvania State University
KeywordsCapillary pressureRelative permeabilityClassification of discontinuitiesImbibitionMechanicsCapillary actionSaturation (graph theory)WettingEquation of statePermeability (electromagnetism)HysteresisMaterials scienceThermodynamicsChemistryMathematicsPorous mediumGeologyPhysicsMathematical analysisGeotechnical engineeringPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Accurate and continuous capillary pressure (Pc) and relative permeability (kr) models are key relations in modeling of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Current commercial reservoir simulators tune empirical models for relative permeabilities and capillary pressures to experimental data based solely on a limited set of data under immiscible conditions. These empirical models attempt to represent very complex compositional processes, even though they are only a function of phase saturation and type. Thus, "fully" compositional models that use these empirical relations are not fully composition and discontinuities in compositions and saturations result. These discontinuities lead to failed simulations, significant inaccuracies and increased computational time. This paper develops a coupled equation-of-state (EoS) kr-Pc model that can reproduce important features of the current empirical models, but also yield physically consistent predictions that cannot generate discontinuities. The model parameters use the same inputs for both relative permeability and capillary pressure and are tuned simultaneously. We focus here on capillary hysteresis and understanding the components of the EoS from measured data using saturation, phase distribution (Euler characteristic or phase contact area), and wettability as inputs. The new EoS Pc model maintains a similar functional form as the common Brooks-Corey correlation, and can predict capillary pressure away from the tuned experimental data. The results using CT scans of imbibition and drainage processes show excellent agreement once contact angle hysteresis is included. A quadratic response surface is used to understand better the functional form of the EoS, i.e. partial derivative expressions. The new coupled kr-Pc approach could improve compositional simulation by making it faster, more robust, and accurate since these key parameters are more continuous and physical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it