MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795336556 · doi:10.1515/auto-2017-0082

Observer design for monocular visual inertial SLAM

2018· article· en· W2795336556 on OpenAlex
Geoff Fink, Mirko Franke, Alan F. Lynch, Klaus Röbenack

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueat - Automatisierungstechnik · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObserver (physics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMonocularInertial frame of referenceComputer scienceSimultaneous localization and mappingRobotPhysicsMobile robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper examines the state estimation problem for unmanned aerial vehicles when commonly used positioning systems such as the global positioning system or indoor motion capture systems are unavailable. The proposed method uses inertial sensor measurements along with scaled position measurements from an onboard computer vision system which implements visual simultaneous localization and mapping. A state transformation puts the system into a linear time-varying form which simplifies observability analysis and allows for an observer design with sufficient conditions for convergence. The proposed design is validated by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it