MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795416648 · doi:10.1002/ev.20297

My Entry to the Field

2018· article· en· W2795416648 on OpenAlexaff
J. Bradley Cousins

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Directions for Evaluation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)PermissionAdvice (programming)Key (lock)Citizen journalismSociologyWork (physics)Public relationsComputer sciencePsychologyEngineering ethicsEpistemologyWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceComputer securityPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract J. Bradley Cousins traces some key advice from his mother and the example of his father through serendipitous encounters with mentors and work opportunities as instrumental in helping him develop a practical, utilization and problem‐solving orientation to the participatory evaluation approach he has used throughout his informal and professional evaluation life. See the interview document here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/ev.20297/suppinfo . Read only. This should not be used in any form without explicit permission from the author.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3590.139

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.401 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Directions for EvaluationSame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207