L’articulation entre travail domestique et travail militant. Le cas des « mouvements de sans » en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’enquêtes ethnographiques – par observation participante, entretien, questionnaire – dans quatre mobilisations dites de sans (chômeurs et chômeuses, sans-papiers), l’auteur analyse les modes d’articulation entre travail domestique et travail militant en termes de consubstantialité des rapports sociaux de sexe, de classe et de race. Il montre que l’accès au militantisme est clivé par la polarisation et la diversité sexuées des expériences du travail domestique (exploiteur/exploitée versus abandon, autonomie, partage, privation). D’une part, les logiques domestiques orientent les modes d’entrée et d’inscription dans le travail militant. D’autre part, les formes de la division du travail militant ont des effets ambivalents sur l’assignation domestique des femmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".