Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
She Answered Every Call: Life of Public Health Nurse, Mona Gordon Wilson (1894-1981). Douglas O. Baldwin. Charlottetown: Indigo Press, 1997.The Women of Royaumont: A Scottish Women's Hospital on Western Front. Eileen Crofton. East Lothian: Tuckwell Press, 1997The Military Nurses of Canada: Recollections of Canadian Military Nurses. Vol. 1 E.A. Landells, ed. Whiterock, BC: Co-Publishing, 1995.Bedside Matters: Transformation of Canadian Nursing, 1900-1990. Kathryn McPherson. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1996.Nobody Ever Wins a War: World War I Diaries of Ella Mae Bongard, R.N. Eric Scott, ed. Ottawa: Janeric Enterprises, 1997.Jean I. Gunn: Nursing Leader. Natalie Riegler. Markham: A.M.S./Fitzhenry & Whiteside, 1997.Canadian nursing history is strongly rooted in conventional biography and descriptive narrative style. Consequently, careful recording of events and preservation of archival material has ensured a rich resource for future research in nursing's early development and its notable leaders (Gibbon and Mathewson). While recording contributions of exceptional nurses, this method necessarily limits analysis of role of wider community of nursing practitioners, preventing comprehensive understanding of nursing's history and development and its place in history of women's work. In 1991, historian Veronica Strong-Boag confidently predicted that the history of nurses is changing women's history and history of Canada; she noted a new interest in nurses and nursing among social historians as they began to question nursing's relationship to issues of gender, class and race (231). Yet historians Kathryn McPherson and Meryn Stuart have cautioned that not all nursing scholars welcome these new studies informed or motivated by political theory, and many prefer that nursing history mainly serve nursing's own interests (18). This conservative approach history has led to cautious consideration of nursing within broader context of Canadian social history. By comparison, in 1980s American scholarship took lead in examining work and culture of nursing. New interpretations by American historians Barbara Melosh in The Physician's Hand: Work, Culture and Conflict in American Nursing (1982) and Susan Reverby in Ordered to Care: Dilemma of American Nursing, 1856-1945 (1987), directed American nursing scholarship towards labour history as a model for analysis. Until recently, Canadian nursing lacked a similar analytical framework for interpretation of its own historical development.The history of nursing in Canada spans centuries; before religious nursing orders brought to continent by earliest European colonists were healing practices of Aboriginal peoples. Yet nursing as an organised and structured profession for Canadian women dates only from late nineteenth century, when Victorian enthusiasm for order and institution building gave rise to development of hospital system (Rosenberg). regularised training of Canadian nurses was initiated as educated, single, young women were recruited to prepare for certification as graduate nurses over a two- or three-year period while working on hospital wards. new century saw evolution of standardised, professional nursing in Canada, with much credit due to a generation of remarkable leaders, each of whom put a distinctive stamp on her own training programme. history of these inspired women has dominated wider development of Canadian nursing history into 1990s, but achievements of much larger force of working nurses who trained in schools, served in field of public health, and were a major component in development of a much-heralded Canadian hospital-care system, deserves equal scrutiny; Kathryn McPherson's Bedside Matters: Transformation of Canadian Nursing, 1900-1990 has finally given Canadian nursing history its own comprehensive analysis. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it