Programme école-famille axé sur la littérature jeunesse à la maternelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente un programme intitulé Les mille et un plaisirs de lire avec toi qui a été offert à 59 parents et six enseignantes de maternelle 5 ans du Québec. Ce programme, qui avait notamment pour but de développer les compétences langagières et sociales des enfants, assurait le lien entre l’école et la famille par l’entremise de trousses littéraires qui circulaient dans les maisons. Des ateliers de formation étaient offerts aux parents et aux enseignantes afin d’assurer une cohérence entre leurs pratiques de lecture. Le principal objectif de la recherche était d’évaluer l’effet du programme sur la qualité des interventions des parents lors de la lecture interactive d’albums à leur enfant. Cet article explique la recherche quasi expérimentale à laquelle ont pris part les parents et les enseignantes et rapporte les résultats révélant que le programme a contribué à les sensibiliser à l’importance de susciter des interactions de qualité lors de la lecture interactive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".