L’enseignement ménager au Québec : entre « mystique » féminine et professionnalisation, 1930-19601
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteure explore les différentes manières d’envisager l’enseignement ménager au coeur du xx e siècle québécois, en particulier la tension entre un enseignement professionnel et un enseignement ayant pour objet la formation de bonnes mères et épouses canadiennes-françaises. Un bref portrait de l’enseignement ménager et de la formation de celles qui y travaillent au Québec est d’abord présenté, suivi d’une analyse des relations difficiles entre le Département de l’instruction publique et l’École ménagère provinciale, relations cristallisées par l’enjeu de la formation ménagère professionnelle : l’auteure veut ainsi illustrer les diverses façons de considérer l’éducation et le travail féminin qui s’entrechoquent dans les années d’après-guerre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".