MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795651924

A mid-infrared vector vortex coronagraph for METIS: the AGPM project

2013· article· en· W2795651924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Absil

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisCoronagraphGeographyAstronomyRemote sensingPhysicsComputer scienceWorld Wide WebExoplanet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main science cases of a diffraction-limited mid-infrared imager on the E-ELT will be the discovery and characterisation of extrasolar planets through direct imaging. The instrument will therefore need to provide high-dynamic range imaging at angular separations as small as possible from the target stars. Up to now, little attention has been paid to coronagraphic applications in the mid-infrared regime, because the dynamic range of 10-m class telescopes is generally limited more by background noise than by residual stellar light in direct images. This will not be the case any longer when using the collecting area of a 40-m class telescope, so that specific coronagraphs providing both a deep star light rejection on a wide band and a small inner working angle need to be designed and tested. Since 2005, we have been developing a new type of vector vortex coronagraph, called the Annular Groove Phase Mask (AGPM), based on concentric sub-wavelength gratings. This design inherently provides a small inner working angle and a 360∞ discovery space, while being adapted to broadband operation. Indeed, the grating parameters can be tuned to make the phase shift quasi-achromatic over a wide band. During the past few years, we have developped nano-lithography techniques on CVD diamond substrates to produce subwavelength gratings for the mid-infrared domain, and a first generation of AGPMs has recently been manufactured for the L and N bands. In this talk, I will review the coronagraphic performance that we measured when testing these AGPMs in the lab and on the sky, including their recent first light on VLT/NACO and VLT/VISIR. These results will be discussed in the E-ELT context, and the perspectives for applications on METIS will be described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207