MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795661296 · doi:10.1063/1.5039344

An open and flexible digital phase-locked loop for optical metrology

2018· article· en· W2795661296 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)SoftwareActuatorElectronicsOptical fiberMetrologyDigital controlNoise (video)Control softwareInterface (matter)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an open and flexible digital phase-locked loop optimized for laser stabilization systems. It is implemented on a cheap and easily accessible FPGA-based digital electronics platform (Red Pitaya) running a customizable open-source firmware. A PC-based software interface allows controlling the platform and optimizing the loop parameters remotely. Several tools are included to allow measurement of quantities of interest smoothly and rapidly. To demonstrate the platform's capabilities, we built a fiber noise canceller over a 400 m fiber link. Noise cancellation was achieved over a 30 kHz bandwidth, a value limited mainly by the delays introduced by the actuator and by the round-trip propagation over the fiber link. We measured a total latency of 565 ns for the platform itself, limiting the theoretically achievable control bandwidth to approximately 225 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207