IDENTIDADE PROFISIONAL DE ENFERMEIROS/AS: PERSPECTIVAS DE FORMAÇÃO DOCENTE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo introduz a discussão oriunda de pesquisa de Mestrado em Educação, em andamento. Busca compreender as perspectivas de formação do enfermeiro/a docente em relação a seu trabalho na educação profissional no sentido de perceber a identidade docente. Entendemos a construção deste conhecimento como espaço de reflexão, além de possibilitar mudanças na prática docente, permite a reflexividade sobre esta identidade profissional, construindo pistas e novas perspectivas de formação pedagógica, buscando um maior aprofundamento teórico, metodológico e interpretativo. Entendemos o quanto é importante redescobrir uma nova e mais poderosa identidade profissional para esses novos desafios do sistema educacional para o melhor exercício docente. Neste contexto, a prática reflexiva é apontada como referencial para o desenvolvimento da formação da identidade docente
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".