MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795683104 · doi:10.1542/neo.19-4-e224

Control of Breathing and Apnea of Prematurity

2018· article· en· W2795683104 on OpenAlex
Ruben Alvaro

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoReviews · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineApnea of prematurityHypoxemiaApneaBradycardiaCardiorespiratory fitnessControl of respirationBreathingPeriodic breathingVentilation (architecture)PopulationAnesthesiaPediatricsRespiratory systemIntensive care medicineInternal medicineHeart rateGestational agePregnancyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apnea of prematurity is a significant clinical problem manifested by an unstable respiratory pattern leading to bradycardia and hypoxemia. Most of these apneas are idiopathic and represent a physiologic manifestation of an immature control of breathing and adaptation to extrauterine life. In extremely preterm infants, this unstable breathing pattern superimposed on an immature lung that is injured by inflammation and infection may lead to frequent and profound episodes of intermittent hypoxemia. These cardiorespiratory events during early postnatal life may be associated with both short- and long-term morbidity. In this review the author discusses the most important pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for periodic breathing and apnea in preterm infants, as well as the diagnostic assessment and therapeutic interventions that help to stabilize breathing in this unique population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it