MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2795698767

Abstract 17922: Scleroderma Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension is Associated With a High Prevalence of Aortic Stenosis

2016· article· en· W2795698767 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram Gurtu, Adam Kinnaird, Linda Webster, Evangelos D. Michelakis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyPulmonary hypertensionDyslipidemiaStenosisPopulationScleroderma (fungus)BMPR2DiseasePathologyBone morphogenetic protein
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Traditional risk factors for aortic stenosis (AS) include age, male sex, hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidemia, while inflammation and increased bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling have been implicated in disease progression. BMP signaling is suppressed in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and these patients are usually younger at the time of diagnosis, mostly female, and typically do not have traditional AS risk factors. On the other hand, PAH, and particularly scleroderma associated PAH (Scl-PAH) patients, have a high burden of systemic inflammation. Hypothesis: Following serial clinical observations, we hypothesized that the prevalence of AS would be higher in patients with Scl-PAH or idiopathic PAH (iPAH) compared to the normal population, where it is observed in 1% of women and 1.5% of men 65-75yo and in even less (0.6%) of patients 55-65yo. Methods: We reviewed ECHO and clinical data from a prospective database in our pulmonary hypertension clinic since 2002. This included Scl-PAH (n=116), iPAH (n=99), and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH, as a control group, n=98). The presence of AS, grade of disease, aortic valve area, peak aortic jet velocity and maximum aortic pressure gradient were analyzed. Results: In Scl-PAH vs iPAH vs CTEPH groups, the mean age was 55.8±1.3 vs 54.8±1.7 vs 59.9±1.7 years; the %females was, 87.1% vs 68.7% vs 61%; the mean PA pressure by catheterization was 34.8±2.4 vs 49.3±1.6 vs 43.1±1.2 mmHg, respectively. AS was present in 13.8% of Scl-PAH vs 6.1% of iPAH and 4.1% of CTEPH patients. The rate of progression of AS in Scl-PAH was 0.42m/s/year, a rate that in the general population is associated with worse outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with Scl-PAH may be a previously unidentified high-risk group for AS development, with high prevalence and fast progression rates. The AS risk is particularly high in these younger and mostly female patients considering the typical absence of known AS risk factors in Scl-PAH. If our data are confirmed in larger and multicenter cohorts, they would suggest a need for increased awareness for AS in Scl-PAH patients, whose serious co-morbidities and PAH-therapies (vasodilators, transplantation) can significantly complicate the management of AS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases→French-language works237,207→