The New Reality in Canada/U.S. Relations: Reconciling Security and Economic Interests and the Smart Border Declaration - Canadian Speaker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SpeakerThank you very much.For those of you who you do not follow Canada politics, John Manley was declaring his intention to run as the leader of the Liberal Party and to replace the current Prime Minister.'So he has, obviously, got other things on his mind these days as well as being Prime Minister and Finance Minister in his leadership campaign.A few weeks ago I was in Strasbourg, France for a meeting of legal advisors for the Council of Europe.I returned to Canada via Frankfurt and took a bus from Strasbourg to Frankfurt.At one point we had passed a number of abandoned looking buildings.I was sort of curious as to what they were and I looked out the window and there was one of those European Union signs that said Deutschland.We just crossed the France/Germany border.I wondered at the time how much blood had been shed over the centuries defending that border for all intents and purposes for goods and people that have now disappeared.I thought as well, thinking of this conference, how over the years the Canada and U.S. borders have been, in our minds, I think very different. SECURITY AND THE CANADA-U.S. BORDERIn his masterful book, "Diplomacy," Henry Kissinger notes one reason the United States has grown so powerful is because of its friendly neighbors.Americans have not had to worry about defending themselves on their Robert Hage is Director for the European Union in the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (Canada) and served in Canadian Embassies in Washington, Lagos, Paris and as Deputy Head of Mission in the Canadian Mission to the European Union in Brussels.With the Department in Ottawa, Mr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".