MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795757616 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.235119

Spin-orbit coupled systems in the atomic limit: rhenates, osmates, iridates

2018· article· en· W2795757616 on OpenAlexafffund
Arun Paramekanti, David J. Singh, Bo Yuan, D. Casa, Ayman Said, Young‐June Kim, A. D. Christianson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceBasic Energy SciencesUT-BattelleBattelleU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsAb initioElectronic structureElectronic correlationHamiltonian (control theory)ElectronSpin–orbit interactionSpectral lineCondensed matter physicsCoupling (piping)Strongly correlated materialAb initio quantum chemistry methodsAtomic physicsHubbard modelQuantum mechanicsSuperconductivityMaterials scienceMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by RIXS experiments on a wide range of complex heavy oxides, including rhenates, osmates, and iridates, we discuss the theory of RIXS for site-localized ${t}_{2g}$ orbital systems with strong spin-orbit coupling. For such systems, we present exact diagonalization results for the spectrum at different electron fillings, showing that it accesses ``single-particle'' and ``multiparticle'' excitations. This leads to a simple picture for the energies and intensities of the RIXS spectra in Mott insulators such as double perovskites which feature highly localized electrons, and yields estimates of the spin-orbit coupling and Hund's coupling in correlated $5d$ oxides. We present new higher resolution RIXS data at the Re ${L}_{3}$ edge in ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{YReO}}_{6}$ which finds a previously unresolved peak splitting, providing further confirmation of our theoretical predictions. Using ab initio electronic structure calculations on ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}\mathcal{M}{\mathrm{ReO}}_{6}$ (with $\mathcal{M}=\mathrm{Re}$, Os, Ir) we show that while the atomic limit yields a reasonable effective Hamiltonian description of the experimental observations, effects such as ${t}_{2g}\ensuremath{-}{e}_{g}$ interactions and hybridization with oxygen are important. Our ab initio estimate for the strength of the intersite exchange coupling shows that, compared to the ${d}^{3}$ systems, the exchange is one or two orders of magnitude weaker in the ${d}^{2}$ and ${d}^{4}$ materials, which may partly explain the suppression of long-range magnetic order in the latter compounds. As a way to interpolate between the site-localized picture and our electronic structure band calculations, we discuss the spin-orbital levels of the $\mathcal{M}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ cluster. This suggests a possible role for intracluster excitons in ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{YIrO}}_{6}$ which may lead to a weak breakdown of the atomic ${J}_{\mathrm{eff}}=0$ picture and to small magnetic moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207