Study on the Hydrodynamic Performance of a Floating KuroshioCurrent Turbine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 20KW prototype floating current turbine was designed for operating in the Kuroshio Current, passes along the eastern coast of Taiwan at a maximum speed of approximately 1.5m/s. The location and speed of the Kuroshio Current are generally consistent, offering Taiwan a stable and secure energy source. A test apparatus, which included a 800-W 1/5 scale model of the proposed turbine, was prepared to measure the rotation, thrust and torque of the designed turbine. The apparatus was tested in a towing tank at constant speed. The rotation of the turbine was controlled using an electronic brake to simulate the torque induced by the generator. The power coefficient, torque coefficient and thrust coefficient were calculated from the measured data. The relationships of these three coefficients with tip speed ratio were determined. The measured power coefficient and torque coefficient agreed well with the calculated results. Whereas the measured thrust coefficient was higher than that calculated. The likely cause of the high measured thrust coefficient is discussed in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".