MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795776589 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-01/42/2467

(Invited) A Frequency Domain Optofluidics Dissolved Oxygen Sensor

2018· article· en· W2795776589 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Xiong, Eric Mahoney, Joe F. Lo, Colleen Chau, Ravi Selvaganapathy, Qiyin Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotodiodeFluorescenceQuenching (fluorescence)Oxygen sensorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptofluidicsMaterials sciencePhotobleachingOxygenIntensity (physics)Sensitivity (control systems)ChemistryOptoelectronicsOpticsNanotechnologyPhysicsElectronic engineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentration of Dissolved oxygen (DO) is an important indicator of water quality. Fluorescence quenching is a commonly used optical method to measure DO. Steady-state fluorescence intensity measurements are easy to be influenced by acquisition artifacts, which makes determination of absolution DO values difficult. We developed a miniaturized, optofluidics frequency-domain DO sensor that measures fluorescence quenching using fluorescence lifetime changes of Ruthenium (Ru(dpp)3Cl2) rather than intensity. Dissolved oxygen is quantified by the phase shift between excitation modulation and emission modulation through process. Compact, low cost components such as diode lasers and photodiodes have been used for the potential of scalable distributed sensing applications. The sensor is evaluated using water samples with different oxygen concentrations. Experimental results show that the lifetime measured in frequency domain corresponds well to dissolved oxygen concentration. Long-term experimental demonstrates that the proposed sensor remains stable in the presence of photobleaching; since the measured phase shift is not affected by reduction of the fluorescence intensity. The sensitivity of the DO measurement is also enhanced through the total internal reflection design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207