Bibliographic record
Abstract
La nostalgie comme catégorie géographique : une proposition théorique Dans la littérature scientifique, la nostalgie a été critiquée pour sa supposée capacité à falsifier les narrations historiques, idéaliser un passé et masquer les divisions sociales et les rapports de force existants dans la revalorisation mémorielle et patrimoniale. Prenant le contrepied de ces analyses, l'article aborde et questionne la nostalgie non seulement comme un sentiment individuel et collectif, mais aussi comme un discours et une pratique socioculturelle qui s'incarnent dans l'espace et le présent. À partir d'une revue de littérature, cet article propose des pistes de réflexions théoriques afin de construire la nostalgie comme catégorie d'analyse capable d'interroger à la fois la relation affective de l'être humain à l'espace, sa relation subjective au temps et aux matérialités et la manière dont les pratiques et discours qui en sont issus participent à la production de l'espace. L'article est une invitation à prendre part aux débats à propos des dimensions géographiques de la nostalgie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".