Modeling solid-state detonation based on thermochemical equilibrium calculations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work describes the application of a recently developed Calculation of Phase Diagrams (CALPHAD) method to perform condensed-phase thermochemical equilibrium calculations of Chapman–Jouguet (CJ) detonation properties for a number of new mixtures speculated to support gasless detonation. Mixtures in question are titanium–silicon (Ti–Si), the common thermite mixture of aluminum–iron oxide (Al–Fe2O3), and zinc–sulfur (Zn–S). The high-pressure products of these reactive mixtures were found to be stable, and thus suitable for gasless CJ detonation calculations. The CJ calculation method was found to be successful for these mixtures, and the results showed CJ detonation properties with high temperatures, but only marginal volume increase. While this is expected for condensed-phase products, the calculations nevertheless show that gasless detonation may be possible under a very narrow range of conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it