MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795849568 · doi:10.4271/2018-01-0327

Induction Heating of Catalytic Converter Systems and its Effect on Diesel Exhaust Emissions during Cold Start

2018· article· en· W2795849568 on OpenAlexafffund
Nickolas Leahey, Rob Crawford, John M. Douglas, Jennifer Bauman

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsCold start (automotive)Diesel exhaustCatalytic converterAutomotive engineeringDiesel exhaust fluidEnvironmental scienceDiesel fuelExhaust gas recirculationDiesel engineExhaust gasDiesel particulate filterWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, environmental regulations in the automotive industry have become increasingly strict, particularly with respect to emissions from diesel engines. Large amounts of these harmful emissions are released during the cfold start of a vehicle, due to the catalytic converter system not yet reaching its light-off temperature. This paper presents an induction heating system which heats the catalytic converter during a cold start, reducing the time for it to reach light-off temperature, and thus reducing cold-start emissions. Detailed dynamometer testing results are used to develop vehicle models of the induction heating system for a diesel Peugeot 308 light duty vehicle. The model is used to quantify the changes in hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and fuel consumption on a variety of standard drive cycles. The results are then extrapolated to investigate the reduction of emissions possible on a Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD heavy-duty vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicInduction Heating and Inverter TechnologyFrench-language works237,207