MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795907120 · doi:10.4414/fms.2007.06227

Prévenir la chronification des lombalgies non spécifiques. 2e partie. Recommandations thérapeutiques basées sur les preuves durant les différentes phases de lévolution

2007· article· fr· W2795907120 on OpenAlexaff
P Keel, Helmut Schwarz, P Brem, C Operschall

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Médical Suisse ‒ Swiss Medical Forum · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Physiotherapy Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the majority of cases acute low back pain largely subsides within a few days to weeks, but in some patients it persists for weeks to months, even where no clear cause can be found. The unfavourable course is often preceded by several recurrences with a favourable course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum Médical Suisse ‒ Swiss Medical ForumSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207