Colette Guillaumin au Guandong : une sociologie historique de la force de travail féminine chinoise1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement capitaliste chinois a fait ressortir l’importance de la mobilisation desdagongmei, ces jeunes travailleuses soumises à un régime de travail disciplinaire dans les industries exportatrices intégrées au marché mondial. L’auteur propose une analyse sociohistorique de la main-d’oeuvre féminine où il suggère l’importance économique de l’appropriation du corps des femmes pour les familles chinoises : il en déduit que des rapports de sexage historiquement constitués lient l’ancienne division sexuelle du travail de la Chine impériale avec le mode de régulation du travail présent de nos jours dans les zones économiques spéciales. Ces rapports de sexage se trouvant au coeur même du capitalisme, l’auteur conclut qu’il est nécessaire de concevoir capitalisme et sexage sur le même plan ontologique, soit celui des pratiques sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".