A Search for Molecular Gas in the Host Galaxy of FRB 121102
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present Submillimeter Array and Northern Extended Millimeter Array observations of the host galaxy of FRB 121102 in the CO 3–2 and 1–0 transitions, respectively. We do not detect emission from either transition. We set 3σ upper limits to the CO luminosity L CO < 2.5 × 107 K km s−1 pc−2 for CO 3–2 and L CO < 2.3 × 109 K km s−1 pc−2 for CO 1–0. For Milky Way–like star formation properties, we set a 3σ upper limit on the H2 mass of 2.5 × 108 M ⊙, slightly less than the predictions for the H2 mass based on the star formation rate. The true constraint on the H2 mass may be significantly higher, however, because of the reduction in CO luminosity that is common for low-metallicity dwarf galaxies like the FRB host galaxy. These results demonstrate the challenge of identifying the nature of FRB progenitors through study of the host galaxy molecular gas. We also place a limit of 42 μJy (3σ) on the continuum flux density of the persistent radio source at 97 GHz, consistent with a power-law extrapolation of the low-frequency spectrum, which may arise from an active galactic nucleus or other nonthermal source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".