MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Os impactos da terapia quimioterápica e as implicações para a manutenção do cuidado. Um estudo de representações sociais / Impacts of therapy chemotherapy and implications for maintenance care. A social representations study

2018· article· pt· W2795969610 on OpenAlexaff
Sílvio Éder Dias da Silva, Joel Lobato da Costa, Jeferson Santos Araújo, Adriana Alaíde Alves Moura, Natacha Mariana Farias da Cunha, Fernanda Furtado da Cunha

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental Online · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O estudo tem por objetivo compreender os impactos da terapia quimioterápica, as implicações para a manutenção do cuidado e analisar as representações sociais desses pacientes. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo com abordagem qualitativa, utiliza como aporte teórico o fenômeno da Teoria das Representações Sociais desenvolvida com embasamento nos achados relativos às falas dos 26 pacientes em tratamento quimioterápico a análise aplicou-se a técnica de análise temática em psicologia. O estudo possui aprovação do Comitê e atende a Resolução nº 466/12. Nos resultados do estudo evidenciamos o quanto é necessário compreender as representações dos sujeitos em tratamento quimioterápico, reconhecendo, dessa forma, sua complexidade. Vivenciar além do cotidiano e a vida diár™ia dos pacientes em quimioterapia, avaliar as suas tristezas, angústias, vitorias, assim como ter contato direto com o mesmo assim surgindo a necessidade de conhecer melhor a realidade dos pacientes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental OnlineSame topicHealth, Nursing, Elderly CareFrench-language works237,207