Size effect of ultra‐high performance fiber reinforced concrete composite beams in shear
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a finite element model (FEM) based on a concrete damage‐plasticity approach was developed to investigate the size effect of ultra‐high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) and normal‐strength concrete or high‐strength concrete (NSC/HSC) composite beams. The material behavior of UHPFRC was modeled by introducing a suitable tension stiffening model to simulate the behavior of UHPFRC beams in tension. Specimens containing UHPFRC with different fiber volume content that have an overall height between 300 and 1,200 mm, a constant shear span‐effective depth ratio of 3 and no stirrups were investigated. The validity of the proposed model was established through comparisons between the experimental test results and those obtained in other studies. The results revealed that the size effect of UHPFRC members was diminished for fiber volume content higher than 1.5% due to the high ductility of UHPFRC material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it