MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796080197 · doi:10.4271/2018-01-1134

Ion Current Measurement of Diluted Combustion Using a Multi-Electrode Spark Plug

2018· article· en· W2796080197 on OpenAlexafffund
Shouvik Dev, Navjot Singh Sandhu, Mark Ives, Shui Yu, Ming Zheng, Jimi Tjong

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpark plugElectrodeCurrent (fluid)SPARK (programming language)Materials scienceCombustionIonIon currentAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringChemistryMechanical engineeringEngineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Close-loop feedback combustion control is essential for improving the internal combustion engines to meet the rigorous fuel efficiency demands and emission legislations. A vital part is the combustion sensing technology that diagnoses in-cylinder combustion information promptly, such as using cylinder pressure sensor and ion current measurement. The promptness and fidelity of the diagnostic are particularly important to the potential success of using intra-cycle control for abnormal cycles such as super knocking and misfiring. Many research studies have demonstrated the use of ion-current sensing as feedback signal to control the spark ignition gasoline engines, with the spark gap shared for both ignition and ion-current detection. During the spark glow phase, the sparking current may affect the combustion ion current signal. Moreover, the electrode gap size is optimized for sparking rather than measurement of ion current. For improving fuel efficiency using diluted combustion, the ion current measurement could be useful for engine control. One solution is to use dedicated ion current probes which would require additional space in the engine, and may increase design complexity. In this paper, the authors propose the use of a multi-electrode spark plug for sparking and ion current measurement. This plug takes up the same area as a conventional spark plug. It has three central electrodes - one is used for sparking, and the other two are used for simultaneous and independent ion current measurement. Signal validation tests were performed in a constant volume combustion chamber using optical methods. Subsequently, the performance of the multi-electrode plug was tested on an engine at different operating conditions such as air-fuel ratio, exhaust gas recirculation, spark timing, and compression ratio. Comparisons were made with a conventional spark plug. It was found that the multi-electrode plug could detect combustion reliably even at dilute conditions. The ability to measure at two locations simultaneously improved the accuracy of the measurement, and minimized false detection.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207