MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796108275 · doi:10.11159/icte18.114

Research on Calculation Method Based on Information Entropy aboutTraffic Signs in China

2018· article· en· W2796108275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yaping Zhang, Shouming Qi, Yanli Ma, Liwei Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSafety Warnings and Signage
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsChinaEntropy (arrow of time)Computer scienceData miningData scienceGeographyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driving on the highway, drivers can make accurate operation only by making effective perception and judgment of the obtained effective information transferred from highway traffic engineering facilities. Therefore, it is required that not only should we make reasonable designs and setting for the traffic engineering facilities, and a miscellaneous design and set for some important traffic information, we should also ensure that the drivers have a good dynamic visibility and can cope with the environment by a sufficient amount of information transferred from highway traffic engineering facilities. A lot of useful researches and studies have carried out in the relevant aspects of the traffic information quantity at home and abroad, and they got a lot of achievements. But those researches primarily focused on the macroscopic qualitative analysis or aimed at a single category of traffic engineering facilities of traffic information threshold, which lack of systematic overall discussion for highway engineering facilities information quantity or model construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicSafety Warnings and SignageFrench-language works237,207