MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796121324 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2018.2823080

Silicon Slot Waveguide Electro-Optic Kerr Effect Modulator

2018· article· en· W2796121324 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak V. Simili, Michael Čada, Jaromı́r Pištora

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorSlot-waveguideWaveguideOpticsMaterials scienceModulation (music)OptoelectronicsBandwidth (computing)SiliconUltrashort pulseSilicon photonicsOptical ring resonatorsKerr effectPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theoretical background to calculate the effective index tuning using the ultrafast electro-optic Kerr effect and a design of slot waveguide geometry are presented. Analysis of the slot waveguide ring resonator with silicon nanocrystals as the active medium to implement the CMOS compatible electro-optic Kerr effect modulator indicates a modulation bandwidth of 51 GHz, therefore, allowing for 90 Gb/s data rate transmission, and a low energy consumption of 22.99 fJ/bit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207