Identification et thérapie: l'emploi du journal intime dans le roman pour adolescentes au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: D. Di Cecco analyzes the use of private diary in four novels by M. Marineau, S. Desrosiers and D. Demers. This literary device has many functions. It enables the authors to explore the tension between private and public space (family background vs social obligations), examine the difficult mother-daughter relationship, and study the identity problems of the diarists, torn between a conflictual personal context and the new—but often contradictory—social role of women. Resume: Cet article analyse l'emploi du journal intime dans quatre romans pour adolescent(e)s de M. Marineau, S. Desrosiers et D. Demers. Ce mode d'ecriture remplit plusieurs fonctions: il permet d'approfondir la tension entre espace prive (la famille) et espace public (le monde exterieur), d'explorer la difficile relation mere-fille et, enfin, d'examiner les problemes identitaires des redactrices, dechirees entre me situation emotive conflictuelle et le nouveau role social des femmes, souvent contradictoire en soi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".