MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2796163060

The quake-proof houses by Porcheddu Company in the Messina reconstruction after the earthquake of 1908

2017· article· en· W2796163060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paolo Piantanida, Caterina Mele

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuake (natural phenomenon)DamagesForensic engineeringQuarter (Canadian coin)EngineeringArchaeologyHistoryGeologySeismologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The earthquake in 1908 razed to the grounds the town of Messina and Reggio Calabria, with a lot of buildings literally pulverized. Together with the loss of many thousands of lifes and the enormous amount of damages it came the destruction of the cultural heritage. Immediately after this quake, the Porcheddu Company of Turin (importer in North Italy of the Hennebique building system) was charged of 13 projects in Messina: among these, the economical houses for the Unione Messinese in the Orto Botanico district, the Lombardo quarter, the Homes for the State employees, with pillars made of a prefabricated steel cage and on site poured concrete. This paper is mainly based on unpublished material in the Porcheddu archive, hosted at DISEG in the Turin Polytechnic, focusing on the feature analysis of the quake-proof Porcheddu buildings in the Messina area

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage→French-language works237,207→