MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796299567 · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2823658

Kalman Filter-Based Large-Scale Wildfire Monitoring With a System of UAVs

2018· article· en· W2796299567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsKalman filterComputer scienceScale (ratio)Ensemble Kalman filterExtended Kalman filterEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfires play an important role in forest management, while an accurate assessment of current wildfire status is imperative for fire management. In this paper, a Kalman filter-based methodology is proposed to estimate the wildfire progress with online measurements that are collected by a system of unmanned aerial vehicles. The method is developed to estimate the wildfire propagation behavior as well as fire front contour. It is enabled by developing a scalar field wildfire model and utilizing the Kalman filter to estimate the parameters of the model. In addition, an uncertainty function is developed to describe the performance of the estimation results. The effectiveness of the algorithm is demonstrated in an independent fire simulation environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it