On the asymptotic analysis of the JWKB method via change of dependent variable in the first-order Bessel’s equation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first-order Jeffreys–Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin method (called (JWKB)1) is a conventional semi-classical approximation method used in quantum mechanical systems for accurate solutions. It is known to give accurate energy and wave-function in the classically accessible region of the related quantum mechanical system defined by Schroedinger’s equation whereas the solutions in the classically inaccessible region require special treatment, conventionally known as the asymptotic matching rules. In this work, (JWKB)1 solution of the Bessel differential equation of the first order (called (BDE)1), chosen as a mathematical model, is studied by being transformed into the normal form via the change of dependent variable. General JWKB solution of the initial value problem where appropriately chosen initial values are applied is studied in both normal and standard form representations to be analyzed by the generalized JWKB asymptotic matching rules regarding the Sij matrix elements defined in the literature. Consequently, regions requiring first-order and zeroth-order JWKB approximations are determined successfully.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".