MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796320152 · doi:10.30962/ec.v11i1.274

Experiência urbana e narrativas de crime

2008· article· pt· W2796320152 on OpenAlexaff
Paulo Vaz, Gaëlle Rony

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Compós · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo, propomos que as notícias de crime são, hoje, um elemento decisivo na conformação da experiência da cidade e da alteridade. Para sustentar teórica e empiricamente a proposição, argumentamos, em primeiro lugar, que a retórica dos meios de comunicação usa as lógicas do medo e da compaixão para favorecer a identificação da audiência com o sofrimento de estranhos. Na seqüência, analisamos o modo como a descrição da cidade por jovens da elite carioca articula insegurança, pobreza e justiça, reiterando em suas grandes linhas as possibilidades de construção de identidade oferecidas pelas notícias de crime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.025
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-CompósSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207