Analisis Manfaat Biaya Program Orang Tua Asuh Pohon Mangrove Di Wilayah Pesisir Karawang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dilakukan analisis manfaat biaya program orang tua asuh pohon mangrove ini adalah mengetahui manfaat dan kelayakan program OTAP (orang tua asuh pohon) mangrove bagi upaya pelestarian lingkungan hidup yang terintegrasi dan berkelanjutan. Metode penelitian dilakukan melalui penelusuran literatur dari dokumentasi aktivitas OTAP yang telah dilaksanakan Pertamina Hulu Energi Onshore North West Java (PHE ONWJ) dan metode penilaian kelayakan program yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis manfaat biaya yang diperluas. Analisis manfaat biaya program OTAP mangrove memberikan kelayakan ekonomi yang positif, sehingga bermanfaat bagi upaya pelestarian lingkungan hidup yang dilakukan di sekitar wilayah kerja PHE ONWJ. Nilai kelayakan dan keberlanjutan program OTAP mangrove yang dibuat dengan asumsi lama program (10 tahun) dan tingkat diskon (5%) menunjukkan nilai manfaat bersih sekarang yang positif sebesar Rp. 1,08 milyar, rasio manfaat biaya (2,06), dan tingkat pengembalian (19%). Kata Kunci: OTAP, ECBA, kelayakan program, jasa ekosistem, investasi hijau
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".