Les effets indésirables des antipsychotiques chez l’enfant et l’adolescent et leur surveillance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume En France, les antipsychotiques sont regulierement prescrits chez l’enfant et l’adolescent et contrairement a l’adulte, les indications concernent souvent des troubles non-psychotiques. Le taux de prescription des antipsychotiques atypiques a connu une augmentation importante au cours des dix dernieres annees. Si la surveillance des effets secondaires chez l’adulte fait l’objet de recommandations precises, ce n’est pas le cas, en France, pour les enfants et adolescents. Dans cet article, nous detaillerons les differents effets secondaires des antipsychotiques, en particulier le syndrome metabolique, l’hyperprolactinemie, les effets cardio-vasculaires et nous evoquerons aussi la sedation, l’hypersalivation, la leucopenie, ainsi que les effets secondaires neurologiques et psycho-comportementaux. En nous appuyant sur les recommandations canadiennes de la CAMESA (Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness and Safety of Antipsychotics in Children), nous donnerons une conduite a tenir pour les prevenir et les prendre en charge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it