Molecular structure and interactions of water intercalated in nickel hydroxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structure and properties of α-Ni(OH)2 containing water and nitrate have been investigated computationally. The adsorption of water molecules on the Ni(OH)2 surface is also investigated to provide insight into the nature of the water-Ni(OH)2 interactions. The spectroscopic and dynamical behaviour of the intercalated species has been characterized and used to explain experimental findings reported for this material. The results presented here indicate that the water molecules interact non-covalently with Ni(OH)2, with a binding energy that is comparable in magnitude with that of the water dimer hydrogen bond. The presence of the intercalated species increases the distance between the Ni(OH)2 layers such that the interlayer interactions are negligible. The weakening of the interlayer interactions facilitates the horizontal displacement of the layers relative to one another, providing a possible origin for stacking faults observed in α-Ni(OH)2. Comparison of the vibrational frequencies calculated here with the experimental spectra confirms that α-Ni(OH)2 containing only water molecules can be synthesized. The structures of the water molecules intercalated in α-Ni(OH)2 were found to be analogous to those absorbed in γ-NiOOH, while the water-layer interactions are stronger in γ-NiOOH. The results presented here characterize the structure and interactions of water intercalated in nickel hydroxides and also provide insights into the effects of intercalated water on the properties of layered metal hydroxides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".