MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796487226 · doi:10.1353/crc.2018.0013

Turns of Event: Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies in Motion ed. by Hester Blum

2018· article· en· W2796487226 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Melissa Gniadek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAmerican History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHistorySubject (documents)Event (particle physics)Field (mathematics)Art historyLiteratureSociologyClassicsArtLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Turns of Event: Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies in Motion ed. by Hester Blum Melissa Gniadek Blum, Hester, ed. Turns of Event: Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies in Motion. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 2016. Pp. 214. It can sometimes feel as though critical trends within nineteenth-century American literary studies shift at a dizzying pace. The essay collection Turns of Event: Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies in Motion takes this very movement as its subject, acknowledging the field's shifting terrain and claiming this constant movement as an asset. As Hester Blum writes in the book's introduction, "The essays collected here seek both to understand the reasons for the critical mobility within the field of Americanist scholarship, and to argue for its propensity to turn as its constitutive strength" (2). Taking the figure of the "turn" as its organizing principle (the book grew out of a 2012 colloquium titled "Turn, Turn, Turn"), the collection does an admirable job of surveying some of the dominant recent critical turns within nineteenth-century American literary studies. Even more importantly, the collection reflects on the nature of turns as such. At various moments in the book, the authors of individual essays directly confront the notion that academic turns reflect utilitarian fads that gain currency because individuals need to be hired, to publish, and to remain current. Instead, these authors remind us, critical turns are dynamic products of where we have been as a field and indicators of where we are going. They are, as Geoffrey Sanborn puts it in the collection's first essay, to be valued as "affective amplifications, ways of turning up the volume on our collective interest in a field" (15). Turns of Event begins with a brief introduction that surveys some of the turns that have had a significant effect on nineteenth-century literary scholarship and introduces the eight essays in the collection. Those essays are divided into two sections. The first section, "Provocations," contains essays that offer helpful genealogies and potential futures for particular turns and fields, as well as more general reflections on "turning." At the center of this section, essays by Meredith McGill and Martin Brückner take up shifting relationships between "Literary History, Book History, and Media Studies" and the possibilities of the "Cartographic Turn," respectively. In her essay, McGill considers the past and present relationships between the three fields in her title, ultimately hoping for a "reintegration" of these fields "on terms that are perhaps more favorable to those trained in literary study" (34). Brückner, on the other hand, reviews the origins and pervasive nature of the cartographic turn, challenging himself and others to "slow down the turn" (56-57), to be mindful of the assumptions at play in cartographic language, and of the need to "comprehend the interconnection between the metaphorical and the material map" (59). Essays by Sanborn and Christopher Castiglia bracket these essays focused on particular fields and turns, opening and closing the book's first section by asking us to step back and appreciate the possibilities of seeing academic work "not as a war of positions but as a [End Page 169] sequence of positionings" (18), in Sanborn's terms, not as weighted toward suspicion but toward hope, in Castiglia's. The book's second section, "Turn-by-Turn Directions: Transnational, Hemispheric, Oceanic," contains essays focused on these various geopolitical orientations. In "Of Turns and Paradigm Shifts: Humanities, Science, and Transnational American Studies," Ralph Bauer considers the applicability of the Kuhnian notion of the "paradigm shift" to turns within the humanities and to the transnational turn in particular. Monique Allewaert's "The Geopolitics and Tropologies of the American Turn" considers the material significance of metaphors inherent in the trope of the turn also at play in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, reading a short story published in 1828 and set in St. Domingue to ultimately argue for "an archipelagic approach […] to postnational American studies" (126). The final two essays in the collection similarly focus on aspects of transnational or postnational American studies, taking the Caribbean and Oceanic turns as their objects. Sean Goudie offers a genealogy of the Caribbean turn even as he challenges...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicAmerican History and CultureFrench-language works237,207