MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796521245

Hasta Hakları Bilgi Düzeyi ile Hasta Güçlendirme Arasındaki İlişki

2017· dissertation· tr· W2796521245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in Turkey
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHastaMedicineGynecologyHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patient rights knowledge level refers to the patients’ level of knowledge of the legislation that regulates the processes that patients engage with health care facilities. With regard to both patients and health care providers, the goals of increasing the knowledge levels of the patient by correct inputs during the treatment processes and getting the patients to be more included in the decisions during the treatment process are becoming increasingly important. In relation to this topic, the concept of patient empowerment has been expressed in terms of patient participation, self-management, patient-centeredness and health literacy concepts. With a limited number of studies conducted on patient rights in our country, it is seen that the issue of patient empowerment is a new concept. For this reason, it is planned to contribute to the national literature through this study. In this context, "The Relationship Between Patient Rights Knowledge Level and Patient Empowerment" is revealed by using the "Patient Empowerment Scale" developed by Small et al. and used in eight different countries such as Spain, Portugal, Canada, USA, Belgium and China.
\nThe study covers patients over 18 years of age who receive long-term care services (diabetes, asthma, cholesterol, blood pressure and congenital heart disease patients) from public and private hospitals operating in Istanbul. Since the detailed statistics on the related diseases were not available, the population of this study was accepted as people over 18 years of age residing in Istanbul. A questionnaire consisting of three sections was applied to the participants.A total of 661 questionnaires were evaluated in this study. As a result of the analyses, a positive correlation between the level of patient rights knowledge and patient empowerment was found (p<0.05). It was also found that the participants’ knowledge levels of patient rights had a positive effect on patient empowerment. Despite the higher knowledge level of patient rights observed in patients receiving health care services from public hospitals compared to those receiving healthcare services from private hospitals, patients receiving healthcare services from public hospitals showed less participation to the statements in the patient empowerment dimension. This result is thought to be due to the fact that the communication between the patients and healthcare workers in private hospitals is stronger, and particularly due to the fact that the relevant treatment and applications are performed more successfully as a result of beter information provided to the patient and the patient being included in the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0070.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it