MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796551282 · doi:10.1017/s1431927602101164

Developing and Implementing a Unified Imaging and Lab Information Management WorkFlow System – Lessons Learned and Insights Gained.

2002· article· en· W2796551282 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher M. Yip

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowLibrary scienceEngineeringEngineering managementManagementComputer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Developing and Implementing a Unified Imaging and Lab Information Management WorkFlow System – Lessons Learned and Insights Gained. Get access Christopher M Yip Christopher M Yip Departments of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, and Biochemistry, Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. University of Toronto 407 – 4 Taddle Creek Rd Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G9 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Microscopy and Microanalysis, Volume 8, Issue S02, 1 August 2002, Pages 458–459, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927602101164 Published: 01 August 2002

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisSame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207