MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796598604 · doi:10.2136/vzj2017.08.0157

Correcting for Biogenic Gas Matrix Effects on Laser‐Based Pore Water‐Vapor Stable Isotope Measurements

2018· article· en· W2796598604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVadose Zone Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopeChemistryWater vaporStable isotope ratioMatrix (chemical analysis)TRACERAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Isotope analysisEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Observed biases were gas matrix effects exclusively caused by biogenic headspace CO 2 . Observed biases exceeded 30× (δ 2 H) and 65× (δ 18 O) accepted measurement uncertainties. The proposed correction scheme uses data from repeated analyses of soil samples only. Post‐correction quality of isotope data matches accepted measurement uncertainties. The presented method helps to avoid grave misinterpretations of soil water isotope data. The isotopic composition (δ 2 H, δ 18 O) of pore water is an invaluable tracer for the minimally invasive study of subsurface water flow and transport processes. Here, we evaluated a method for pore water isotope analysis that combines laser‐based isotope analyzers and water‐vapor isotope equilibration using evaporation‐proof metalized sample bags. We tested inflation atmospheres (dry air vs. pure N 2 ) and the impact of biogenic gas (CO 2 , CH 4 ) accumulation for storage times of up to 4 wk. Samples were analyzed with a water isotope analyzer (Picarro L2120‐ i ) and a gas chromatograph. Air‐inflated water vapor samples showed a greater range of gas matrix effects (δ 18 O: 9.63‰; δ 2 H: 21.7‰) than N 2 –inflated samples (δ 18 O: 7.49‰; δ 2 H: 10.6‰) induced by nonuniform buildup of biogenic CO 2 , starting immediately after sample preparation. However, only air‐inflated samples could be reliably corrected using instrument‐specific sensitivity factors that were empirically determined by interpretation of periodically repeated isotope measurements. Corrected water isotope data were confirmed by similarity with local precipitation and suction cup isotope data. Residual uncertainties were well below the natural variations of soil water isotope values and independent of storage time, thus allowing for consistently reliable interpretations of soil water isotope profiles. We conclude that, especially for pore water sampling that requires small sample volumes and/or long storage times, metalized sample bags should be used to prevent evaporation notwithstanding the enhanced buildup of biogenic gases. Further, if gas matrix effects cannot be excluded, air inflation is preferred over pure N 2 , as only in that case can reliable postcorrections be performed by using internal data only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it