MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796598604 · doi:10.2136/vzj2017.08.0157

Correcting for Biogenic Gas Matrix Effects on Laser‐Based Pore Water‐Vapor Stable Isotope Measurements

2018· article· en· W2796598604 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Gralher, Barbara Herbstritt, Markus Weiler, Leonard I. Wassenaar, Christine Stumpp

Bibliographic record

VenueVadose Zone Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopeChemistryWater vaporStable isotope ratioMatrix (chemical analysis)TRACERAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Isotope analysisEnvironmental chemistryChromatographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Observed biases were gas matrix effects exclusively caused by biogenic headspace CO 2 . Observed biases exceeded 30× (δ 2 H) and 65× (δ 18 O) accepted measurement uncertainties. The proposed correction scheme uses data from repeated analyses of soil samples only. Post‐correction quality of isotope data matches accepted measurement uncertainties. The presented method helps to avoid grave misinterpretations of soil water isotope data. The isotopic composition (δ 2 H, δ 18 O) of pore water is an invaluable tracer for the minimally invasive study of subsurface water flow and transport processes. Here, we evaluated a method for pore water isotope analysis that combines laser‐based isotope analyzers and water‐vapor isotope equilibration using evaporation‐proof metalized sample bags. We tested inflation atmospheres (dry air vs. pure N 2 ) and the impact of biogenic gas (CO 2 , CH 4 ) accumulation for storage times of up to 4 wk. Samples were analyzed with a water isotope analyzer (Picarro L2120‐ i ) and a gas chromatograph. Air‐inflated water vapor samples showed a greater range of gas matrix effects (δ 18 O: 9.63‰; δ 2 H: 21.7‰) than N 2 –inflated samples (δ 18 O: 7.49‰; δ 2 H: 10.6‰) induced by nonuniform buildup of biogenic CO 2 , starting immediately after sample preparation. However, only air‐inflated samples could be reliably corrected using instrument‐specific sensitivity factors that were empirically determined by interpretation of periodically repeated isotope measurements. Corrected water isotope data were confirmed by similarity with local precipitation and suction cup isotope data. Residual uncertainties were well below the natural variations of soil water isotope values and independent of storage time, thus allowing for consistently reliable interpretations of soil water isotope profiles. We conclude that, especially for pore water sampling that requires small sample volumes and/or long storage times, metalized sample bags should be used to prevent evaporation notwithstanding the enhanced buildup of biogenic gases. Further, if gas matrix effects cannot be excluded, air inflation is preferred over pure N 2 , as only in that case can reliable postcorrections be performed by using internal data only.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVadose Zone JournalSame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207