MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796606746 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10905

Development of Volatile Inorganic Compounds and Their Application for Chemical Vapour Deposition of Metal and Metal Oxide Thin Films

2015· dissertation· en· W2796606746 on OpenAlexaff
Agnieszka Kurek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSynthesis and properties of polymers
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopperMetalReactivity (psychology)Materials scienceThin filmOxideChemical vapor depositionEtching (microfabrication)Deposition (geology)Chemical engineeringThermal decompositionCombustion chemical vapor depositionThermal stabilityInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryLayer (electronics)MetallurgyOrganic chemistryCarbon film

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical vapour deposition is a necessary and important technology for the manufacture of nano-thin metal films.The reactivity and thermal stability of the metal complexes used in this process are key to the deposition process.Through logical design, guanidinate ligands have evolved into iminopyrrolidinates to prevent decomposition pathways.These ligands were first tested on aluminum metal centres.Iminopyrrolidinates have been further stabilized with additional methyl moieties and have led to promising new copper precursors.Copper metal is desirable for interconnecting material in electronics due to its high conductivity.The reactivity of 1,3-diisopropyl-imidazolin-2-ylidene copper hexamethyl disilazide has been explored and yielded three new copper metal compounds.Sputtered thin films of gold have been used in metal assisted chemical etching to produce high aspect ratio structures on the surface of silicon substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthesis and properties of polymersFrench-language works237,207