MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796611909

Life Science Programs at the Canadian Light Source: Overview Of The Bio-medical Studies At BMIT

2017· article· en· W2796611909 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tomasz W. Wysokiński, Denise Miller, R. Blyth, Paweł Grochulski

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchrotronCLs upper limitsLight sourcePhysicsOpticsMedicineOptometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Light Source Inc. (CLS) is a mid-size 3-rd generation 2.9 GeV synchrotron located on the campus of the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon (www.lightsource.ca). Currently there are 15 beamlines operating at the facility. Four laboratories: Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility (CMCF), Mid Infrared Spectromicroscopy (Mid-IR), Bio-Medical Imaging and Therapy (BMIT) and Biological X- ray Absorption Spectroscopy (BioXAS) are dedicated to study biological objects ranging from atomic resolution (CMCF and BioXAS) to cells and tissues (BioXAS and Mid-IR) through to larger samples such as organs, live animals and plants (BioXAS and BMIT)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMBES ProceedingsSame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207