Chiral bobbers and skyrmions in epitaxial FeGe/Si(111) films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report experimental and theoretical evidence for the formation of chiral bobbers---an interfacial topological spin texture---in FeGe films grown by molecular beam epitaxy. After establishing the presence of skyrmions in FeGe/Si(111) thin-film samples through Lorentz transmission electron microscopy and the topological Hall effect, we perform magnetization measurements that reveal an inverse relationship between the film thickness and the slope of the susceptibility $(d\ensuremath{\chi}/dH)$. We present evidence for the evolution as a function of film thickness $L$ from a skyrmion phase for $L<{L}_{\mathrm{D}}/2$ to a cone phase with chiral bobbers at the interface for $L>{L}_{\mathrm{D}}/2$, where ${L}_{\mathrm{D}}\ensuremath{\sim}70\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ is the FeGe pitch length. We show using micromagnetic simulations that chiral bobbers, earlier predicted to be metastable, are in fact the stable ground state in the presence of an additional interfacial Rashba Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".