ANALISIS PENAMBAHAN LARUTAN BENTONIT DAN GARAM UNTUK MEMPERBAIKI TAHANAN PENTANAHAN ELEKTRODA PLAT BAJA DAN BATANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grounding system is required in order to protect a building or electronic equipment from damage caused by exposed lightning strikes. The maximum value of grounding resistance for a building is 5 ohm (PUIL 2000) and 3 ohm for electronic equipment (PT Telkom, 1994). A good grounding system is achiered by minimizing the value of the grounding resistance and it is done by giving an additives solution to the ground. The additive solution in this research is the mixture of bentonite and salt solution. After the additive solution was given, it shows the grounding resistance decrease to less then 1 ohm.Sistem pentanahan diperlukan untuk mengamankan suatu gedung atau peralatan elektronik yang ada di dalamnya agar tidak mengalami kerusakan akibat terkena sambaran petir. Nilai tahanan pentanahan maksimum untuk sebuah gedung adalah 5 ohm (PUIL 2000) dan 3 ohm untuk peralatan (PT Telkom, 1994). Perlu dilakukan perencanaan sistem pentanahan yang baik untuk memperkecil nilai tahanan pentanahan yang dapat dilakukan dengan penambahan zat aditif pada tanah. Pada penelitian ini zat aditif berupa larutan garam dan larutan bentonit. Pengukuran yang dilakukan setelah penambahan larutan garam dan bentonit menunjukan penurunan nilai tahanan pentanahan menjadi lebih kecil dari 1 ohm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".