MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796858542 · doi:10.7939/r3vc9t

Neural networks modelling of stream nitrogen using remote sensing information: model development and application

2009· article· en· W2796858542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaForest Resource Improvement Association of AlbertaOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceNitrogenArtificial intelligenceGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In remotely located forest watersheds, monitoring nitrogen (N) in streams often is not feasible because of the high costs and site inaccessibility. Therefore, modelling tools that can predict N in unmonitored watersheds are urgently needed to support management decisions for these watersheds. Recently, remote sensing (RS) has become a cost-efficient way to evaluate watershed characteristics and obtain model input variables. This study was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) modelling tool relying solely on public domain climate data and satellite data without ground-based measurements. ANN was successfully applied to simulate N compositions in streams at studied watersheds by using easily accessible input variables, relevant time-lagged inputs and inputs reflecting seasonal cycles. This study was the first effort to take the consideration of vegetation dynamics into N modelling by using RS-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI) that was capable of describing the differences of vegetation canopy and vegetation dynamics among watersheds. As a further study to demonstrate the applicability of the ANN models to unmonitored watersheds, the calibrated ANN models were used to predict N in other different watersheds (unmonitored watersheds in this perspective) without further calibration. A watershed similarity index was found to show high correlation with the transferability of the models and can potentially guide transferring the trained models into similar unmonitored watersheds. Finally, a framework to incorporate water quantity/quality modelling into forestry management was proposed to demonstrate the application of the developed models to support decision making. The major components of the framework include watershed delineation and classification, database and model development, and scenario-based analysis. The results of scenario analysis can be used to translate vegetation cut into values of EVI that can be fed to the models to predict changes in water quality (e.g. N) in response to harvesting scenarios. The results from this research demonstrated the applicability of ANNs for stream N modelling using easily accessible data, the effectiveness of RS-derived EVI in N model construction, and the transferability of the ANN models. The presented models have high potential to be used to predict N in streams in the real-world and serve forestry management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it