MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2796935879

Characterization of appetite-‐regulating factors in platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus (Cyprinodontiformes Poeciliidae) and cunner, Tautogolabrus adspersus

2016· dissertation· en· W2796935879 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul M. Pitts

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXiphophorusOrexinBiologyCholecystokininCocaine and amphetamine regulated transcriptOrexigenicEndocrinologyInternal medicineNeuropeptideCartAppetiteCyprinodontiformesPoeciliidaeEnteroendocrine cellIn situ hybridizationFlounderNeuropeptide Y receptorGene expressionHormoneEndocrine systemGeneFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsFisheryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The regulation of energy in fish, like most vertebrates, is a complex process that involves a number of chemical signals originating and networking in different parts of the brain and throughout the body. These signals include anorexigenic hormones that suppress feeding and hunger [e.g. cholecystokinin (CCK) and cocaine-­‐and amphetamine-­‐regulated transcript (CART)] as well as orexigenic peptides that stimulate feeding behaviour and food intake [e.g. orexin and neuropeptide Y (NPY)]. Platyfish, Xiphophorus maculatus, are freshwater viviparous fish found in tropical waters from South America to northern Mexico. Although these fish have been the object of numerous physiology and behavioural studies, very little is known about the endocrine mechanisms regulating their feeding. In order to elucidate the role of these peptides in the regulation of feeding, we examined the effects of peripheral injections of CCK and orexin on feeding behaviour and food intake. Injections of CCK decreased both food intake and searching behaviour, while injections of orexin increased searching behaviour but did not seem to have an effect on food consumption. In order to better characterize these peptides, we performed tissue distribution and gene expression studies. Tissue distribution studies show that CCK, CART, NPY and orexin all show a widespread distribution in brain and several peripheral tissues, including intestine. In addition, we compared the expression of these peptides in brain and gut between fed and 10-­‐day fasted platyfish using qPCR. Fasting caused decreases in both CCK and CART mRNA expressions in the brain and a decrease in CCK expression in the intestine. There was also a significant increase in orexin mRNA expression in the brain as a result of fasting. Cunners, Tautogolabrus adspersus, are cold-­‐water oviparous (egg laying) marine fish that can be found from Northern Newfoundland to all along the coast of the western North Atlantic. In cunner, fasting for 10 days caused a decrease in CCK in the brain, and a significant increase in orexin expression in the brain. Fasting had no significant effect on either NPY or CART expression. Furthermore, fasting had no effect on the expression of the peptides studies in the intestine. We also compared the expression of these peptides as a result of fasting in males and females of both species. In platyfish, there was no significant gender specific differences found in the expression of the peptides. In cunner, females showed a significantly higher NPY expression in the brain than males, although this was unique to NPY. The widespread distribution and the fasting-­‐induced changes in expression of these peptides suggest that they might have several physiological roles in platyfish, including the regulation of feeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)→Same topicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth→French-language works237,207→